Nutrition report ready

Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Clover Valley product.

Nutri-Score D NOVA 4

View details

Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian

by Clover Valley 16 fl oz/1 PT/473 ml in Sauces Barcode 0876941006858
Poor nutritional quality
Ultra-processed food

Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian by Clover Valley provides 233 kcal per 100 g, with 3.3 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 71% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Sauces category and comes in a 16 fl oz/1 PT/473 ml pack. Contains: soybeans.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
20 g · High
Saturated fat
3.3 g · Moderate
Sugars
3.3 g · Low
Salt
2 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 2 Tbsp (30 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 233 kcal 70 kcal 216 +8%
Total fat 20 g 6 g 8% 13.9 +44%
Saturated fat 3.3 g 1 g 5% 2.3 +43%
Carbohydrates 13.3 g 4 g 1% 16.5 −19%
Total sugars 3.3 g 1 g 11.3 −71%
Added sugarsUSDA 3.3 g 1 g 2% 7.8 −58%
Protein 0 g 0 g 0% 2.2 −100%
Salt 2 g 0.6 g 2.5 −19%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2957 Sauces products on Foodmetria.

Serving size and added sugars from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from October 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.

Nutrition claims check

Claims its numbers support

Low sugar
3.3 g sugars per 100 g (EU: no more than 5 g per 100 g)

Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.

Compared with other sauces

Calories higher 36%
Sugars lower 32%
Salt higher 34%
Saturated fat higher 26%
Protein top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Water, Soybean Oil, Distilled Vinegar, Fructose, Salt, Dried White Onion, Acetic Acid, Dried Garlic, Modified Food Starch (Corn And/Or Potato), Monosodium Glutamate, Xanthan Gum, Yeast Extract, Sodium Benzoate (Preservative), Potassium Sorbate (Preservative), Sucralose, Edta Calcium Disodium (Preservative), Butylated Hydroxytoluene, Propyl Gallate, Polysorbate 80, Synthetic Lycopene, Fd&C Yellow No 6, Fd&C Yellow No 5, Fd&C Red No 40.

May contain palm oil
Allergens
Soybeans

Additives 13

High overexposure risk
High overexposure risk
E260 - Acetic acid
Preservative
Moderate overexposure risk
High overexposure risk

Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.

Regulatory status of its additives

How the US, individual states and the EU treat additives found in this product's ingredient list.

United States

FDA asks to phase out E129 · E102 · E110

Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102) and Yellow 6 (E110) are among six petroleum-based dyes FDA is asking manufacturers to remove by the end of 2027. The phase-out is voluntary: the dyes remain approved.

California

Barred from California public schools E129 · E102 · E110

The California School Food Safety Act (AB 2316) bars Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102) and Yellow 6 (E110) from food served or sold in public schools from December 31, 2027.

West Virginia

Barred from West Virginia school meals E129 · E102 · E110

West Virginia HB 2354 has barred Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102) and Yellow 6 (E110) from school nutrition programs since August 1, 2025. A statewide ban due January 1, 2028 is on hold under a preliminary injunction (December 23, 2025) while the state appeals.

European Union

Warning label required in the EU E102 · E110 · E129

In the EU, food containing Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Red 40 (E129) must state that it "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children."

What these additives are and what the research says: Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6.

Additives are detected from the ingredient list by Open Food Facts and may be incomplete or out of date. Regulatory status checked October 6, 2026; rules are changing quickly. Not legal advice — always check the package label.

Product details

Quantity
16 fl oz/1 PT/473 ml
Serving size
2 Tbsp (30 g)
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0876941006858

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian?

Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian contains 233 kcal per 100 g and about 70 kcal per serving (2 Tbsp (30 g)).

How much sugar is in Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian?

Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian has 3.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

What allergens does Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian contain?

According to the label data it contains: Soybeans. Recipes change — always check the package label.

Does Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian contain additives restricted in the US or the EU?

Its ingredient list includes Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102) and Yellow 6 (E110). FDA is asking manufacturers to stop using them by the end of 2027 (voluntarily); California bars them from public schools from December 31, 2027; West Virginia bars them from school meals; the EU requires a warning label on food with them. Recipes change — check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated May 3, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Traditional Italian Dressing, Traditional Italian? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sauces

View all →

More from Clover Valley

View all →