Nutrition report ready
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Nutri-Score E NOVA 3
View details
View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein by WKS W. Heine GmbH provides 818 kcal per 100 g, with 1 g of sugars and 1 g of protein. That is 147% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Specks category and comes in a 400g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 818 kcal | 303 +170% |
| Total fat | 90 g | 21.6 +316% |
| Saturated fat | 35 g | 8.3 +324% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 0.9 +9% |
| Total sugars | 1 g | 0.4 +147% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 2.4 −100% |
| Protein | 1 g | 26.4 −96% |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 4 −62% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 89 Specks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other specks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch
Product details
- Quantity
- 400g
- Sold in
- Germany, Luxembourg
- Barcode
- 4260012234008
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein?
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein contains 818 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein?
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein has 1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 29, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More specks
View all →
e NOVA 4 
e 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4