Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein vs Speck
Overall, Speck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Speck
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rückenspeck vom freilaufende... | Speck |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 818 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Fat | 90 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 35 g | 9.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Speck has 66% fewer calories (277 kcal vs 818 kcal).
- Speck has 74% less fat (23 g vs 90 g).
- Speck has 74% less saturated fat (9.2 g vs 35 g).
- Speck has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein has 63% less salt (1.5 g vs 4 g).
- Speck has 96% more protein (28 g vs 1 g).
- Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Speck lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch
Speck
pork, sea salt, dextrose, spices, sugar, preservatives: sodium nitrite, potassium nitrate,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein or Speck?
Overall, Speck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Speck has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 818 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Speck has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.