Comparison

Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein vs Speck

Overall, Speck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRückenspeck vom freilaufende...Speck
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 818 kcal 277 kcal
Fat 90 g 23 g
Saturated fat 35 g 9.2 g
Sugars 1 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.5 g 4 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 1 g 28 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Speck has 66% fewer calories (277 kcal vs 818 kcal).
  • Speck has 74% less fat (23 g vs 90 g).
  • Speck has 74% less saturated fat (9.2 g vs 35 g).
  • Speck has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein has 63% less salt (1.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Speck has 96% more protein (28 g vs 1 g).
  • Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Speck lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein

Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch

Speck

pork, sea salt, dextrose, spices, sugar, preservatives: sodium nitrite, potassium nitrate,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein or Speck?

Overall, Speck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Speck has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 818 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Speck has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons