Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein vs Schinken-Würfel
Overall, Schinken-Würfel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Schinken-Würfel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rückenspeck vom freilaufende... | Schinken-Würfel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 818 kcal | 166 kcal |
| Fat | 90 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 35 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schinken-Würfel has 80% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 818 kcal).
- Schinken-Würfel has 89% less fat (10 g vs 90 g).
- Schinken-Würfel has 87% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 35 g).
- Schinken-Würfel has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein has 53% less salt (1.5 g vs 3.2 g).
- Schinken-Würfel has 94% more protein (18 g vs 1 g).
- Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch
Schinken-Würfel
Schweinefleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel (Natriumascorbat), Konservierungsstoff (Natriumnitrit), Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein or Schinken-Würfel?
Overall, Schinken-Würfel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schinken-Würfel has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 818 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schinken-Würfel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.