Speck Tradizionale vs Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Overall, Speck Tradizionale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Speck Tradizionale
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Speck Tradizionale | Rückenspeck vom freilaufende... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 818 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 90 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 35 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 4.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 30 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Speck Tradizionale has 72% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 818 kcal).
- Speck Tradizionale has 79% less fat (19 g vs 90 g).
- Speck Tradizionale has 87% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 35 g).
- Speck Tradizionale has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein has 67% less salt (1.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Speck Tradizionale has 97% more protein (30 g vs 1 g).
- Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Speck Tradizionale
Schweinefleisch, Salz, Dextrose, Gewürze (Lorbeerblatt, Knoblauch, Koriander, Pfeffer, Wacholder), Gewürzextrakte (Wacholder), Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit. Buchenholzrauch.
Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein
Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Speck Tradizionale or Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein?
Overall, Speck Tradizionale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Speck Tradizionale has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 818 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Speck Tradizionale has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.