Comparison

Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. vs Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein

Overall, Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSüdtiroler Speck g.g.A.Rückenspeck vom freilaufende...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 272 kcal 818 kcal
Fat 16.2 g 90 g
Saturated fat 5.8 g 35 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 3.9 g 1.5 g
Protein 30.8 g 1 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has 67% fewer calories (272 kcal vs 818 kcal).
  • Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has 82% less fat (16.2 g vs 90 g).
  • Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has 83% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 35 g).
  • Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein has 61% less salt (1.5 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has 97% more protein (30.8 g vs 1 g).
  • Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Südtiroler Speck g.g.A.

Schweinefleisch, Salz, Gewirze (schwarzer Pfeffer, Kümmel, Wacholderbeeren, Knoblauch, Rosmarin), Dextrose, Kräuter, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch.

Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein

Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch

FAQ

Which is healthier: Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. or Rückenspeck vom freilaufenden Eichelschwein?

Overall, Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 818 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Südtiroler Speck g.g.A. has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons