Nutrition report ready

Paleta cocida

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Paleta cocida

by Eroski 250 g in White hams Barcode 8480010309539
Poor nutritional quality
Green-Score
f
Environmental impact estimate

Paleta cocida by Eroski provides 95 kcal per 100 g, with 1.5 g of sugars and 15 g of protein. That is 118% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the White hams category and comes in a 250 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
3 g · Low
Saturated fat
1 g · Low
Sugars
1.5 g · Low
Salt
2.2 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 95 kcal 131 −28%
Total fat 3 g 5.2 −42%
Saturated fat 1 g 1.9 −48%
Carbohydrates 2 g 1.1 +83%
Total sugars 1.5 g 0.7 +118%
Protein 15 g 20 −25%
Salt 2.2 g 2.1 +7%

Category average across 6378 White hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other white hams

Calories lower 3%
Sugars higher 5%
Salt higher 18%
Saturated fat lower 13%
Protein top 98%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
250 g
Labels & certifications
No glutenNo lactoseNutriscoreNutriscore Grade C
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010309539

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Paleta cocida?

Paleta cocida contains 95 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Paleta cocida?

Paleta cocida has 1.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Paleta cocida healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Paleta cocida? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More white hams

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →