Nutrition report ready

Jamón cocido lonchas finas

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Jamón cocido lonchas finas

by Eroski in White hams Barcode 8480010052640
Poor nutritional quality
Green-Score
f
Environmental impact estimate

Jamón cocido lonchas finas by Eroski provides 98 kcal per 100 g, with 0.7 g of sugars and 17 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the White hams category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
3 g · Low
Saturated fat
1.1 g · Low
Sugars
0.7 g · Low
Salt
2.3 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 98 kcal 131 −25%
Total fat 3 g 5.2 −42%
Saturated fat 1.1 g 1.9 −42%
Carbohydrates 0.7 g 1.1 −36%
Total sugars 0.7 g 0.7
Protein 17 g 20 −15%
Salt 2.3 g 2.1 +12%

Category average across 6377 White hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other white hams

Calories lower 3%
Sugars higher 34%
Salt higher 14%
Saturated fat lower 25%
Protein top 93%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No glutenNo lactoseNutriscoreNutriscore Grade C
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010052640

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Jamón cocido lonchas finas?

Jamón cocido lonchas finas contains 98 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Jamón cocido lonchas finas?

Jamón cocido lonchas finas has 0.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Jamón cocido lonchas finas healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Jamón cocido lonchas finas? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More white hams

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →