Pršut Cotto

by S-Budget in White hams Barcode 8057204091435
Poor nutritional quality
Green-Score
f
Environmental impact estimate

Pršut Cotto by S-Budget provides 143 kcal per 100 g, with 0.6 g of sugars and 19 g of protein. That is 13% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the White hams category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
6.6 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
2.5 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.6 g · Low
Salt
2.4 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 1 portion (150 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 143 kcal 215 kcal 131 +9%
Total fat 6.6 g 9.9 g 13% 5.2 +27%
Saturated fat 2.5 g 3.8 g 19% 1.9 +31%
Carbohydrates 2 g 3 g 1% 1.1 +83%
Total sugars 0.6 g 0.9 g 0.7 −13%
Protein 19 g 28.5 g 57% 20 −5%
Salt 2.4 g 3.5 g 2.1 +15%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 6374 White hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other white hams

Calories higher 26%
Sugars lower 48%
Salt higher 12%
Saturated fat higher 28%
Protein top 78%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Serving size
1 portion (150 g)
Sold in
Slovenia
Barcode
8057204091435

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Pršut Cotto?

Pršut Cotto contains 143 kcal per 100 g and about 215 kcal per serving (1 portion (150 g)).

How much sugar is in Pršut Cotto?

Pršut Cotto has 0.6 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Pršut Cotto healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 2, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Pršut Cotto? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More white hams

View all →

More from S-Budget

View all →