View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Hinterkochschinken
Hinterkochschinken by Hof Glück provides 116 kcal per 100 g, with 1 g of sugars and 19 g of protein. That is 45% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the White hams category and comes in a 100g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 kcal | 131 −12% |
| Total fat | 4 g | 5.2 −23% |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.9 −16% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 1.1 −9% |
| Total sugars | 1 g | 0.7 +45% |
| Added sugars | 1.2 g | 1.8 −36% |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 −5% |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 2.1 +12% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 6372 White hams products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other white hams
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Schweinefleisch, salz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Glukosesirup, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Natriumcitrate; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Gewürzextrakte, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit.
Additives 4
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 100g
- Labels & certifications
- No GMOsOhne gentechnik
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4314187032683
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Hinterkochschinken?
Hinterkochschinken contains 116 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Hinterkochschinken?
Hinterkochschinken has 1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Hinterkochschinken healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Hinterkochschinken vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More white hams
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
