Vpd filet sole map (4pc) vs Filets de sole
Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vpd filet sole map (4pc) | Filets de sole |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de sole has 21% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 75 kcal).
- Filets de sole has no fat, while Vpd filet sole map (4pc) has 0.5 g.
- Filets de sole has no sugar, while Vpd filet sole map (4pc) has 0.5 g.
- Filets de sole has 71% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.5 g).
- Vpd filet sole map (4pc) has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
- Only Filets de sole lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Vpd filet sole map (4pc)
Sole nettoyée
Filets de sole
Filets de _sole_ (solea solea), pêchée au chalut en atlantique nord-est, sous zone mer du nord.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vpd filet sole map (4pc) or Filets de sole?
Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de sole has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de sole has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.