Filets de sole vs Filets de sole tropicale
Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de sole | Filets de sole tropicale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 59 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de sole has 14% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 69 kcal).
- Filets de sole has no fat, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
- Filets de sole has no saturated fat, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
- Filets de sole has no sugar, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
- Filets de sole tropicale has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- Only Filets de sole lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de sole
Filets de _sole_ (solea solea), pêchée au chalut en atlantique nord-est, sous zone mer du nord.
Filets de sole tropicale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de sole or Filets de sole tropicale?
Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de sole has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de sole has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.