Comparison

Filets de sole vs Filets de sole tropicale

Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de soleFilets de sole tropicale
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 59 kcal 69 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.4 g
Fiber 1.7 g —
Protein 14 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de sole has 14% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 69 kcal).
  • Filets de sole has no fat, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
  • Filets de sole has no saturated fat, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
  • Filets de sole has no sugar, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
  • Filets de sole tropicale has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
  • Only Filets de sole lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filets de sole

Filets de _sole_ (solea solea), pêchée au chalut en atlantique nord-est, sous zone mer du nord.

Filets de sole tropicale

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de sole or Filets de sole tropicale?

Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de sole has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de sole has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons