Filets de sole vs Soles Pelées et Vidées
Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de sole | Soles Pelées et Vidées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 59 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de sole has 23% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Filets de sole has no fat, while Soles Pelées et Vidées has 0.4 g.
- Filets de sole has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Soles Pelées et Vidées has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Filets de sole
Filets de _sole_ (solea solea), pêchée au chalut en atlantique nord-est, sous zone mer du nord.
Soles Pelées et Vidées
_Sole_ commune 100 % (Solea solea).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de sole or Soles Pelées et Vidées?
Overall, Filets de sole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de sole has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de sole has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.