Soles Pelées et Vidées vs Filets de sole tropicale
Overall, Soles Pelées et Vidées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soles Pelées et Vidées | Filets de sole tropicale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de sole tropicale has 10% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Soles Pelées et Vidées has no sugar, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
- Soles Pelées et Vidées has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
- Only Soles Pelées et Vidées lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Soles Pelées et Vidées
_Sole_ commune 100 % (Solea solea).
Filets de sole tropicale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soles Pelées et Vidées or Filets de sole tropicale?
Overall, Soles Pelées et Vidées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de sole tropicale has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soles Pelées et Vidées has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.