Comparison

Soles Pelées et Vidées vs Filets de sole tropicale

Overall, Soles Pelées et Vidées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSoles Pelées et VidéesFilets de sole tropicale
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 77 kcal 69 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.4 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 18 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de sole tropicale has 10% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 77 kcal).
  • Soles Pelées et Vidées has no sugar, while Filets de sole tropicale has 0.3 g.
  • Soles Pelées et Vidées has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
  • Only Soles Pelées et Vidées lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Soles Pelées et Vidées

_Sole_ commune 100 % (Solea solea).

Filets de sole tropicale

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soles Pelées et Vidées or Filets de sole tropicale?

Overall, Soles Pelées et Vidées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de sole tropicale has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Soles Pelées et Vidées has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons