Varitas de Merluza vs Tuna Steak
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Varitas de Merluza | Tuna Steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 158 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Steak has 15% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 185 kcal).
- Tuna Steak has 21% less fat (6.4 g vs 8.1 g).
- Tuna Steak has no sugar, while Varitas de Merluza has 2 g.
- Varitas de Merluza has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Tuna Steak has 54% more protein (25 g vs 11.4 g).
- Tuna Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Varitas de Merluza lists: Gluten.
- Only Tuna Steak lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Varitas de Merluza
65% merluza del Pacífico, harina de trigo, aceite de nabina, agua, almidón, sal, levadura, especias (pimentón, pimienta blanca). *Este producto puede contener ocasionalmente alguna espina.
Tuna Steak
Skipjack Tuna 93%, Sunflower Oil, Salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Varitas de Merluza or Tuna Steak?
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Steak has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.