Comparison
Tuna Steak vs Sardine piccanti
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuna Steak | Sardine piccanti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 334 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 7.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 20.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Steak has 53% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 334 kcal).
- Tuna Steak has 77% less fat (6.4 g vs 28 g).
- Tuna Steak has 90% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 7.9 g).
- Sardine piccanti has 35% less salt (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Tuna Steak has 18% more protein (25 g vs 20.4 g).
- Tuna Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tuna Steak lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Tuna Steak
Skipjack Tuna 93%, Sunflower Oil, Salt
Sardine piccanti
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuna Steak or Sardine piccanti?
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Steak has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.