Tuna Steak vs Fiskekaker
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuna Steak | Fiskekaker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Steak has 16% less fat (6.4 g vs 7.6 g).
- Tuna Steak has 73% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3 g).
- Tuna Steak has no sugar, while Fiskekaker has 1.7 g.
- Tuna Steak has 33% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Fiskekaker has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Tuna Steak has 56% more protein (25 g vs 11 g).
- Tuna Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tuna Steak lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Tuna Steak
Skipjack Tuna 93%, Sunflower Oil, Salt
Fiskekaker
Hysefilet (60 %), helmelk, potetmel, smør, løk, salt, konsistensmiddel (karragenan), muskatblomme, hvit pepper. Stekt i rapsolje.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuna Steak or Fiskekaker?
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskekaker has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.