Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Fiskekaker
Overall, Fiskekaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Icre de crap cu ceapa | Fiskekaker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 648 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 69.3 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiskekaker has 77% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 648 kcal).
- Fiskekaker has 89% less fat (7.6 g vs 69.3 g).
- Fiskekaker has 62% less saturated fat (3 g vs 7.9 g).
- Icre de crap cu ceapa has 94% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Icre de crap cu ceapa has 75% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.3 g).
- Fiskekaker has 53% more protein (11 g vs 5.2 g).
- Fiskekaker has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Icre de crap cu ceapa
Not available.
Fiskekaker
Hysefilet (60 %), helmelk, potetmel, smør, løk, salt, konsistensmiddel (karragenan), muskatblomme, hvit pepper. Stekt i rapsolje.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Icre de crap cu ceapa or Fiskekaker?
Overall, Fiskekaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskekaker has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 648 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Icre de crap cu ceapa has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.