Comparison

Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Varitas de Merluza

Overall, Varitas de Merluza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientIcre de crap cu ceapaVaritas de Merluza
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 648 kcal 185 kcal
Fat 69.3 g 8.1 g
Saturated fat 7.9 g 1 g
Sugars 0.1 g 2 g
Salt 1.6 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.2 g 0.6 g
Protein 5.2 g 11.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Varitas de Merluza has 71% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 648 kcal).
  • Varitas de Merluza has 88% less fat (8.1 g vs 69.3 g).
  • Varitas de Merluza has 87% less saturated fat (1 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Icre de crap cu ceapa has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2 g).
  • Varitas de Merluza has 45% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Icre de crap cu ceapa has 50% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Varitas de Merluza has 54% more protein (11.4 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Varitas de Merluza has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Varitas de Merluza lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Icre de crap cu ceapa

Not available.

Varitas de Merluza

65% merluza del Pacífico, harina de trigo, aceite de nabina, agua, almidón, sal, levadura, especias (pimentón, pimienta blanca). *Este producto puede contener ocasionalmente alguna espina.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Icre de crap cu ceapa or Varitas de Merluza?

Overall, Varitas de Merluza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Varitas de Merluza has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 648 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Icre de crap cu ceapa has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons