Varitas de Merluza vs Fiskekaker
Overall, Varitas de Merluza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Varitas de Merluza | Fiskekaker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiskekaker has 21% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 185 kcal).
- Varitas de Merluza has 67% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3 g).
- Fiskekaker has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Varitas de Merluza has 35% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Varitas de Merluza has 50% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.3 g).
- Varitas de Merluza has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Varitas de Merluza lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Varitas de Merluza
65% merluza del Pacífico, harina de trigo, aceite de nabina, agua, almidón, sal, levadura, especias (pimentón, pimienta blanca). *Este producto puede contener ocasionalmente alguna espina.
Fiskekaker
Hysefilet (60 %), helmelk, potetmel, smør, løk, salt, konsistensmiddel (karragenan), muskatblomme, hvit pepper. Stekt i rapsolje.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Varitas de Merluza or Fiskekaker?
Overall, Varitas de Merluza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskekaker has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiskekaker has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.