Posta de atum dos Açores vs Thon au chili
Overall, Thon au chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Posta de atum dos Açores | Thon au chili |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 283 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thon au chili has 64% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 283 kcal).
- Thon au chili has 82% less fat (4 g vs 22.5 g).
- Thon au chili has 89% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 3.8 g).
- Posta de atum dos Açores has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Posta de atum dos Açores has 44% more protein (19.5 g vs 11 g).
- Thon au chili has the better Nutri-Score.
- Posta de atum dos Açores is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Posta de atum dos Açores
Atum, azeite e sal
Thon au chili
Thon (49%), eau, sucre, huile de tournesol, concentré de tomates, chili (3%), amidon de tapioca modifié, sel, épaissisant: gomme guar, poivron en poudre (0,5%), exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique, ail en poudre, vinaigre de riz, colorant: extrait de paprika,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Posta de atum dos Açores or Thon au chili?
Overall, Thon au chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thon au chili has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 283 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Posta de atum dos Açores has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.