Comparison

Trancetti di tonno vs Thon au chili

Overall, Thon au chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrancetti di tonnoThon au chili
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 231 kcal 102 kcal
Fat 15 g 4 g
Saturated fat 2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0 g 3.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 24 g 11 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thon au chili has 56% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 231 kcal).
  • Thon au chili has 73% less fat (4 g vs 15 g).
  • Thon au chili has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Trancetti di tonno has no sugar, while Thon au chili has 3.5 g.
  • Thon au chili has 39% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Trancetti di tonno has 54% more protein (24 g vs 11 g).
  • Thon au chili has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Thon au chili lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Trancetti di tonno

95% tonnetto striato, 3% olio di oliva, 2% sale

Thon au chili

Thon (49%), eau, sucre, huile de tournesol, concentré de tomates, chili (3%), amidon de tapioca modifié, sel, épaissisant: gomme guar, poivron en poudre (0,5%), exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique, ail en poudre, vinaigre de riz, colorant: extrait de paprika,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trancetti di tonno or Thon au chili?

Overall, Thon au chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thon au chili has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trancetti di tonno has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons