Posta de atum dos Açores vs Trancetti di tonno
Overall, Trancetti di tonno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Posta de atum dos Açores | Trancetti di tonno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 283 kcal | 231 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trancetti di tonno has 18% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 283 kcal).
- Trancetti di tonno has 33% less fat (15 g vs 22.5 g).
- Trancetti di tonno has 47% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Trancetti di tonno has no sugar, while Posta de atum dos Açores has 0.5 g.
- Posta de atum dos Açores has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Trancetti di tonno has 19% more protein (24 g vs 19.5 g).
- Only Posta de atum dos Açores lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Posta de atum dos Açores
Atum, azeite e sal
Trancetti di tonno
95% tonnetto striato, 3% olio di oliva, 2% sale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Posta de atum dos Açores or Trancetti di tonno?
Overall, Trancetti di tonno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trancetti di tonno has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 283 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trancetti di tonno has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.