Comparison

Posta de atum dos Açores vs Trancetti di tonno

Overall, Trancetti di tonno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPosta de atum dos AçoresTrancetti di tonno
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 283 kcal 231 kcal
Fat 22.5 g 15 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 19.5 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trancetti di tonno has 18% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 283 kcal).
  • Trancetti di tonno has 33% less fat (15 g vs 22.5 g).
  • Trancetti di tonno has 47% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Trancetti di tonno has no sugar, while Posta de atum dos Açores has 0.5 g.
  • Posta de atum dos Açores has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Trancetti di tonno has 19% more protein (24 g vs 19.5 g).
  • Only Posta de atum dos Açores lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Posta de atum dos Açores

Atum, azeite e sal

Trancetti di tonno

95% tonnetto striato, 3% olio di oliva, 2% sale

FAQ

Which is healthier: Posta de atum dos Açores or Trancetti di tonno?

Overall, Trancetti di tonno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trancetti di tonno has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 283 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trancetti di tonno has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons