Century tuna (h) 155g vs Posta de atum dos Açores
Overall, Posta de atum dos Açores has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Century tuna (h) 155g | Posta de atum dos Açores |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 196 kcal | 283 kcal |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 22.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.3 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 19.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Soybeans | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Century tuna (h) 155g has 31% fewer calories (196 kcal vs 283 kcal).
- Century tuna (h) 155g has 44% less fat (12.5 g vs 22.5 g).
- Posta de atum dos Açores has 39% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 6.3 g).
- Century tuna (h) 155g has no sugar, while Posta de atum dos Açores has 0.5 g.
- Posta de atum dos Açores has 21% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Posta de atum dos Açores has 36% more protein (19.5 g vs 12.5 g).
- Posta de atum dos Açores is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Century tuna (h) 155g lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Century tuna (h) 155g
Tuna Flakes, Water, Soya Oil, Soy Protein Concentrate, Iodized Salt, Sugar, Chili, Spices, Seasonings [MSG (Flavor Enhancer)], and Bay Leaf.
Posta de atum dos Açores
Atum, azeite e sal
FAQ
Which is healthier: Century tuna (h) 155g or Posta de atum dos Açores?
Overall, Posta de atum dos Açores has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Century tuna (h) 155g has fewer calories: 196 kcal versus 283 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Century tuna (h) 155g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.