Paleta mangalica vs Jamon de cebo iberico
Overall, Paleta mangalica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paleta mangalica | Jamon de cebo iberico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 272 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 17.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.3 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 32 g | 26.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paleta mangalica has no sugar, while Jamon de cebo iberico has 0.4 g.
- Jamon de cebo iberico has 11% less salt (4.4 g vs 5 g).
- Paleta mangalica has 18% more protein (32 g vs 26.3 g).
Ingredients
Paleta mangalica
Paleta de cerdo mangalica, sal.
Jamon de cebo iberico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paleta mangalica or Jamon de cebo iberico?
Overall, Paleta mangalica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jamon de cebo iberico has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 272 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paleta mangalica has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.