Oven Roasted Ham vs Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham
Overall, Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oven Roasted Ham | Prime cuts wafer thin cooked... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 124 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 21.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 7 |
| Allergens | Pork | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has 11% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 124 kcal).
- Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has 50% less fat (2 g vs 4 g).
- Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has 56% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has 35% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has 50% more fiber (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Oven Roasted Ham
Pork (95%), Salt, Dextrose, Spices, Spice Extracts, Stabiliser: Triphosphates, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite.
Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham
Pork 98%, Mineral Sea Salt, Brown Sugar, Stabilisers (Potassium Triphosphate, Sodium Triphosphate, Tetrapotassium Diphosphate), Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate), Preservative (Sodium Nitrite).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oven Roasted Ham or Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham?
Overall, Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prime cuts wafer thin cooked ham has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 124 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oven Roasted Ham has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.