Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 | Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad has 49% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 83% less fat (1.5 g vs 9 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 73% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 69% less sugar (2.2 g vs 7 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.5 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 55% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480
mąka pszenna
Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 or Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad?
Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.