Comparison

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad

Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMąka pszenna Szymanowska 480Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 350 kcal 180 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 9 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.5 g
Sugars 2.2 g 7 g
Salt 0 g 1.5 g
Fiber 2.2 g 1 g
Protein 12 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad has 49% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 83% less fat (1.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 73% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 69% less sugar (2.2 g vs 7 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 55% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480

mąka pszenna

Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 or Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad?

Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons