Comparison
Gluteenijauho vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Overall, Gluteenijauho has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gluteenijauho | Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 79 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad has 55% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Gluteenijauho has 44% less fat (5 g vs 9 g).
- Gluteenijauho has 33% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Gluteenijauho has 86% less sugar (1 g vs 7 g).
- Gluteenijauho has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Gluteenijauho has 87% more protein (79 g vs 10 g).
- Gluteenijauho has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Gluteenijauho
Not available.
Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gluteenijauho or Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad?
Overall, Gluteenijauho has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gluteenijauho has less sugar: 1 g versus 7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Freee White bread flour... vs Gluteenijauho
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska... vs Gluteenijauho
Gluteenijauho vs Pšeničná bílkovina
Biologische tarwebloem vs Gluteenijauho
Freee White bread flour... vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska... vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad
Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad vs Pšeničná bílkovina
Biologische tarwebloem vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad