Comparison

Biologische tarwebloem vs Gluteenijauho

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBiologische tarwebloemGluteenijauho
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 352 kcal 400 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 5 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1 g
Sugars 1.8 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 4.5 g 1 g
Protein 12.6 g 79 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Biologische tarwebloem has 12% fewer calories (352 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has 78% less fat (1.1 g vs 5 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Gluteenijauho has 44% less sugar (1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has 78% more fiber (4.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Gluteenijauho has 84% more protein (79 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Only Biologische tarwebloem lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Biologische tarwebloem

100% biologische tarwebloem

Gluteenijauho

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Biologische tarwebloem or Gluteenijauho?

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Biologische tarwebloem has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gluteenijauho has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons