Comparison

Biologische tarwebloem vs Pšeničná bílkovina

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBiologische tarwebloemPšeničná bílkovina
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 352 kcal 383 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 3.8 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.8 g 4.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 4.5 g 5.2 g
Protein 12.6 g 70 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Biologische tarwebloem has 71% less fat (1.1 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has 56% less sugar (1.8 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Pšeničná bílkovina has 13% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Pšeničná bílkovina has 82% more protein (70 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Biologische tarwebloem

100% biologische tarwebloem

Pšeničná bílkovina

Pšeničný lepek (bílkovina pšeničná jedlá vitální)-alergen.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Biologische tarwebloem or Pšeničná bílkovina?

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Biologische tarwebloem has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biologische tarwebloem has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons