Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 vs Pšeničná bílkovina
Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 | Pšeničná bílkovina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 70 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 61% less fat (1.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 46% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Pšeničná bílkovina has 58% more fiber (5.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pšeničná bílkovina has 83% more protein (70 g vs 12 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480
mąka pszenna
Pšeničná bílkovina
Pšeničný lepek (bílkovina pšeničná jedlá vitální)-alergen.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 or Pšeničná bílkovina?
Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.