Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 vs Gluteenijauho
Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 | Gluteenijauho |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 79 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 13% fewer calories (350 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 70% less fat (1.5 g vs 5 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Gluteenijauho has 55% less sugar (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 55% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1 g).
- Gluteenijauho has 85% more protein (79 g vs 12 g).
- Only Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480
mąka pszenna
Gluteenijauho
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 or Gluteenijauho?
Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gluteenijauho has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.