Comparison

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 vs Gluteenijauho

Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMąka pszenna Szymanowska 480Gluteenijauho
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 350 kcal 400 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 5 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.2 g 1 g
Protein 12 g 79 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 13% fewer calories (350 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 70% less fat (1.5 g vs 5 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Gluteenijauho has 55% less sugar (1 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 55% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Gluteenijauho has 85% more protein (79 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480

mąka pszenna

Gluteenijauho

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 or Gluteenijauho?

Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gluteenijauho has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons