Comparison

Freee White bread flour imp vs Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480

Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFreee White bread flour impMąka pszenna Szymanowska 480
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 351 kcal 350 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.3 g 2.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.4 g 2.2 g
Protein 5.3 g 12 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Freee White bread flour imp has 40% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Freee White bread flour imp has 86% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 36% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has 56% more protein (12 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Freee White bread flour imp

Flour blend (rice, tapioca, potato), thickener (xanthan gum).

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480

mąka pszenna

FAQ

Which is healthier: Freee White bread flour imp or Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480?

Overall, Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Freee White bread flour imp has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons