Comparison

Freee White bread flour imp vs Biologische tarwebloem

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFreee White bread flour impBiologische tarwebloem
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 351 kcal 352 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.3 g 1.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.4 g 4.5 g
Protein 5.3 g 12.6 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Freee White bread flour imp has 83% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has 69% more fiber (4.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has 58% more protein (12.6 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Biologische tarwebloem has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Biologische tarwebloem is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Biologische tarwebloem lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Freee White bread flour imp

Flour blend (rice, tapioca, potato), thickener (xanthan gum).

Biologische tarwebloem

100% biologische tarwebloem

FAQ

Which is healthier: Freee White bread flour imp or Biologische tarwebloem?

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Freee White bread flour imp has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Freee White bread flour imp has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons