Comparison

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 vs Biologische tarwebloem

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480

POLSKIE MŁYNY · 1kg

a NOVA 1

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480	Biologische tarwebloem
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	350 kcal	352 kcal
Fat	1.5 g	1.1 g
Saturated fat	0.4 g	0.4 g
Sugars	2.2 g	1.8 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	2.2 g	4.5 g
Protein	12 g	12.6 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Gluten	Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Biologische tarwebloem has 27% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
Biologische tarwebloem has 18% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
Biologische tarwebloem has 51% more fiber (4.5 g vs 2.2 g).

Ingredients

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480

mąka pszenna

Biologische tarwebloem

100% biologische tarwebloem

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 or Biologische tarwebloem?

Overall, Biologische tarwebloem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska 480 has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biologische tarwebloem has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Mąka pszenna Szymanowska... vs Gluteenijauho Biologische tarwebloem vs Gluteenijauho Freee White bread flour... vs Mąka pszenna Szymanowska... Freee White bread flour... vs Biologische tarwebloem Mąka pszenna Szymanowska... vs Pšeničná bílkovina Mąka pszenna Szymanowska... vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad Biologische tarwebloem vs Pšeničná bílkovina Biologische tarwebloem vs Shangai Sixi Kaofu Salad