La croquante vs Sonnenblumenkerne
Overall, La croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La croquante | Sonnenblumenkerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 616 kcal | 660 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 7.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La croquante has 18% less fat (51 g vs 62 g).
- La croquante has 15% less saturated fat (6 g vs 7.1 g).
- La croquante has 23% less sugar (2 g vs 2.6 g).
- La croquante has 20% more protein (25 g vs 20 g).
- La croquante has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
La croquante
Graines de tournesol décortiquées, graines de courge décortiquées, pignons de pin décortiqués
Sonnenblumenkerne
Bio Sonnenblumenkerne*, geschält *Aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: La croquante or Sonnenblumenkerne?
Overall, La croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La croquante has fewer calories: 616 kcal versus 660 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La croquante has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.