La croquante vs Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne
Overall, Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
La croquante
Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La croquante | Salat-Plus - Mischung aus So... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 616 kcal | 538 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 37 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 29.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne has 13% fewer calories (538 kcal vs 616 kcal).
- Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne has 27% less fat (37 g vs 51 g).
- La croquante has 42% more fiber (12 g vs 7 g).
- Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne has 14% more protein (29.1 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
La croquante
Graines de tournesol décortiquées, graines de courge décortiquées, pignons de pin décortiqués
Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne
Sonnenblumenkerne (50%), Kürbiskerne (35%), Pinienkerne (15%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: La croquante or Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne?
Overall, Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salat-Plus - Mischung aus Sonnenblumen-, Kürbis- & Pinienkerne has fewer calories: 538 kcal versus 616 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La croquante has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.