La croquante vs Frutos secos
Overall, La croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La croquante | Frutos secos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 616 kcal | 622 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 54 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 6.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 9.7 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La croquante has 75% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- La croquante has 19% more fiber (12 g vs 9.7 g).
- La croquante has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
La croquante
Graines de tournesol décortiquées, graines de courge décortiquées, pignons de pin décortiqués
Frutos secos
INFORMACIÓN NUTRICIONAL Flores medios por porción** 25g * 642 kJ/ Valor energético
FAQ
Which is healthier: La croquante or Frutos secos?
Overall, La croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La croquante has fewer calories: 616 kcal versus 622 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La croquante has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.