Finely Sliced Roast Ham vs Traditional ham
Overall, Traditional ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Finely Sliced Roast Ham | Traditional ham |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 141 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 19.9 g | 22.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Traditional ham has 13% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Traditional ham has 52% less fat (3 g vs 6.3 g).
- Traditional ham has 43% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.1 g).
- Traditional ham has 70% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Finely Sliced Roast Ham has 36% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Traditional ham has 13% more protein (22.8 g vs 19.9 g).
- Finely Sliced Roast Ham has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Finely Sliced Roast Ham
Not available.
Traditional ham
Irish Pork, Salt, Sugars, Stabilisers: Triphosphates, Polyphosphates, Dextrose, Yeast Extract, Preservatives: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate. 117g of raw pork per 100g of finished product.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Finely Sliced Roast Ham or Traditional ham?
Overall, Traditional ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Traditional ham has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Traditional ham has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1 g per 100 g.