Italian inspired Sicilian ham vs Traditional ham
Overall, Italian inspired Sicilian ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Italian inspired Sicilian ha... | Traditional ham |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 22.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Traditional ham has 73% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- Italian inspired Sicilian ham has 30% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Italian inspired Sicilian ham has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Italian inspired Sicilian ham
Sertéshús 95 %, jódozott étkezési só (étkezési só, kálium-jodát), zöldfűszerkivonatok, glükózszirup, szárított paradicsom, dextróz, cukor, stabilizátor: trifoszfátok, antioxidáns: nátrium-aszkorbát, tartósítószer: nátrium-nitrit.
Traditional ham
Irish Pork, Salt, Sugars, Stabilisers: Triphosphates, Polyphosphates, Dextrose, Yeast Extract, Preservatives: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate. 117g of raw pork per 100g of finished product.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Italian inspired Sicilian ham or Traditional ham?
Overall, Italian inspired Sicilian ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Italian inspired Sicilian ham has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Traditional ham has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.