Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Słonecznik łuskany
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne | Słonecznik łuskany |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 421 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 26.1 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 8.5 g |
| Protein | 30.3 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 32% fewer calories (421 kcal vs 618 kcal).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 50% less fat (26.1 g vs 52 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 47% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 5.1 g).
- Słonecznik łuskany has 17% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 31% more protein (30.3 g vs 21 g).
- Only Słonecznik łuskany lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
GRAINES DE TOURNESOL, GOMME ARABIQUE, ARÔME. PEUT CONTENIR DES TRACES D'ARACHIDES, DE SÉSAME, SOJA ET D'AUTRES NOIX.
Słonecznik łuskany
Ziarno słonecznika łuskane. Produkt może zawierać: orzeszki ziemne, orzechy, nasiona sezamu mleko (łącznie z laktoza), soję i gluten pszenny.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne or Słonecznik łuskany?
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Słonecznik łuskany has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.