Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas gigante con sal
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne | Pipas gigante con sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 421 kcal | 569 kcal |
| Fat | 26.1 g | 49.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 30.3 g | 19.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 26% fewer calories (421 kcal vs 569 kcal).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 48% less fat (26.1 g vs 49.8 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 48% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 5.2 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 36% more protein (30.3 g vs 19.3 g).
- Pipas gigante con sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
GRAINES DE TOURNESOL, GOMME ARABIQUE, ARÔME. PEUT CONTENIR DES TRACES D'ARACHIDES, DE SÉSAME, SOJA ET D'AUTRES NOIX.
Pipas gigante con sal
Pipas de girasol, sal (7%) y harina de arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne or Pipas gigante con sal?
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 569 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.