Comparison

Pipas sin sal vs Pipas gigante con sal

Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Pipas sin sal	Pipas gigante con sal
Nutri-Score	—	a
NOVA group	1	3
Calories	101 kcal	569 kcal
Fat	5.8 g	49.8 g
Saturated fat	0.7 g	5.2 g
Sugars	0.5 g	2.7 g
Salt	—	0.4 g
Fiber	10 g	5.8 g
Protein	3.6 g	19.3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Pipas sin sal has 82% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 569 kcal).
Pipas sin sal has 88% less fat (5.8 g vs 49.8 g).
Pipas sin sal has 87% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 5.2 g).
Pipas sin sal has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
Pipas sin sal has 42% more fiber (10 g vs 5.8 g).
Pipas gigante con sal has 81% more protein (19.3 g vs 3.6 g).
Pipas sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Only Pipas sin sal lists: None.

Ingredients

Pipas sin sal

Pipas de girasol.

Pipas gigante con sal

Pipas de girasol, sal (7%) y harina de arroz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas sin sal or Pipas gigante con sal?

Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas sin sal has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 569 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas sin sal has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas gigante con sal Sunflower & Pumpkin Seed... vs Pipas gigante con sal Pipas sin sal vs Sunflower & Pumpkin Seed... Pipas sin sal vs Słonecznik łuskany Słonecznik łuskany vs Pipas gigante con sal Pipas Gigantes Aguasal vs Pipas gigante con sal Pipas sin sal vs Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne Pipas sin sal vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal