Comparison

Pipas Gigantes Aguasal vs Pipas gigante con sal

Overall, Pipas gigante con sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Pipas Gigantes Aguasal	Pipas gigante con sal
Nutri-Score	d	a
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	612 kcal	569 kcal
Fat	50.1 g	49.8 g
Saturated fat	5.2 g	5.2 g
Sugars	3.5 g	2.7 g
Salt	2 g	0.4 g
Fiber	—	5.8 g
Protein	30.9 g	19.3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Pipas gigante con sal has 23% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.5 g).
Pipas gigante con sal has 80% less salt (0.4 g vs 2 g).
Pipas Gigantes Aguasal has 38% more protein (30.9 g vs 19.3 g).
Pipas gigante con sal has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pipas Gigantes Aguasal

Not available.

Pipas gigante con sal

Pipas de girasol, sal (7%) y harina de arroz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas Gigantes Aguasal or Pipas gigante con sal?

Overall, Pipas gigante con sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas gigante con sal has fewer calories: 569 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas gigante con sal has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Semi di girasole tostati vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal Pipas sin sal vs Pipas gigante con sal Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas gigante con sal Sunflower & Pumpkin Seed... vs Pipas gigante con sal Sunflower & Pumpkin Seed... vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal Słonecznik łuskany vs Pipas gigante con sal Pipas sin sal vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal