Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne | Pipas Gigantes Aguasal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 421 kcal | 612 kcal |
| Fat | 26.1 g | 50.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 30.3 g | 30.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 31% fewer calories (421 kcal vs 612 kcal).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 48% less fat (26.1 g vs 50.1 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 48% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 5.2 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 24% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
GRAINES DE TOURNESOL, GOMME ARABIQUE, ARÔME. PEUT CONTENIR DES TRACES D'ARACHIDES, DE SÉSAME, SOJA ET D'AUTRES NOIX.
Pipas Gigantes Aguasal
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne or Pipas Gigantes Aguasal?
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.