Comparison
Pipas sin sal vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas sin sal | Pipas Gigantes Aguasal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 612 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 50.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | — | 2 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 30.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas sin sal has 83% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 612 kcal).
- Pipas sin sal has 88% less fat (5.8 g vs 50.1 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 87% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pipas Gigantes Aguasal has 88% more protein (30.9 g vs 3.6 g).
- Only Pipas sin sal lists: None.
Ingredients
Pipas sin sal
Pipas de girasol.
Pipas Gigantes Aguasal
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas sin sal or Pipas Gigantes Aguasal?
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas sin sal has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas sin sal has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Semi di girasole tostati vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal
Pipas sin sal vs Pipas gigante con sal
Pipas sin sal vs Sunflower & Pumpkin Seed...
Sunflower & Pumpkin Seed... vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal
Pipas sin sal vs Słonecznik łuskany
Pipas Gigantes Aguasal vs Pipas gigante con sal
Pipas sin sal vs Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas Gigantes Aguasal