Pipas sin sal vs Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas sin sal | Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 421 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 26.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 30.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas sin sal has 76% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 421 kcal).
- Pipas sin sal has 78% less fat (5.8 g vs 26.1 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 74% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 88% more protein (30.3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pipas sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas sin sal lists: None.
Ingredients
Pipas sin sal
Pipas de girasol.
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
GRAINES DE TOURNESOL, GOMME ARABIQUE, ARÔME. PEUT CONTENIR DES TRACES D'ARACHIDES, DE SÉSAME, SOJA ET D'AUTRES NOIX.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas sin sal or Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne?
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas sin sal has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 421 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas sin sal has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.