Pipas sin sal vs Słonecznik łuskany
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas sin sal | Słonecznik łuskany |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 8.5 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas sin sal has 84% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 618 kcal).
- Pipas sin sal has 89% less fat (5.8 g vs 52 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 86% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 5.1 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 77% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 15% more fiber (10 g vs 8.5 g).
- Słonecznik łuskany has 83% more protein (21 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pipas sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas sin sal lists: None.
- Only Słonecznik łuskany lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pipas sin sal
Pipas de girasol.
Słonecznik łuskany
Ziarno słonecznika łuskane. Produkt może zawierać: orzeszki ziemne, orzechy, nasiona sezamu mleko (łącznie z laktoza), soję i gluten pszenny.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas sin sal or Słonecznik łuskany?
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas sin sal has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas sin sal has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.