View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Klassisk Fårepølse
Klassisk Fårepølse by Gilde provides 338 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 24 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Lamb meat category and comes in a 150g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 slice (5 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 338 kcal | 17 kcal | 178 +90% | |
| Total fat | 27 g | 1.4 g | 2% | 10.9 +147% |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 0.6 g | 3% | 4.7 +155% |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 2 −100% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0 g | 0.7 −100% | |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.3 −100% |
| Protein | 24 g | 1.2 g | 2% | 18.2 +32% |
| Salt | 4.4 g | 0.2 g | 0.8 +450% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 245 Lamb meat products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other lamb meat
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Til 100 g ferdig vare er anvendt 136 g kjøttråvare av får (43 %), storfe og geit, salt, krydder, konserveringsmiddel E250, antioksidant E300, E301, startkultur.
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 150g
- Serving size
- 1 slice (5 g)
- Labels & certifications
- No gluten
- Sold in
- Norway
- Barcode
- 7037204198922
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Klassisk Fårepølse?
Klassisk Fårepølse contains 338 kcal per 100 g and about 17 kcal per serving (1 slice (5 g)).
How much sugar is in Klassisk Fårepølse?
Klassisk Fårepølse has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Klassisk Fårepølse healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated August 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 More lamb meat
View all →
b NOVA 1 
d 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
d NOVA 1 More from Gilde
View all →
c NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4