Lamb leg strak vs Klassisk Fårepølse
Overall, Lamb leg strak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lamb leg strak | Klassisk Fårepølse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 4.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19.8 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lamb leg strak has 54% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Lamb leg strak has 69% less fat (8.4 g vs 27 g).
- Lamb leg strak has 69% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 12 g).
- Lamb leg strak has no salt, while Klassisk Fårepølse has 4.4 g.
- Klassisk Fårepølse has 17% more protein (24 g vs 19.8 g).
- Lamb leg strak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Lamb leg strak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Lamb leg strak
lamb
Klassisk Fårepølse
Til 100 g ferdig vare er anvendt 136 g kjøttråvare av får (43 %), storfe og geit, salt, krydder, konserveringsmiddel E250, antioksidant E300, E301, startkultur.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lamb leg strak or Klassisk Fårepølse?
Overall, Lamb leg strak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lamb leg strak has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lamb leg strak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.